feat: Update documentation to include SparsePauliOp spin chain input
#2606
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
|
note: do not merged until update is released |
|
@mjrodriguez can you assign me as a reviewer ? |
|
@rowenwu I don't believe I can add you as a reviewer. If I there is a way, then it's not immediately obvious to me. Additionally, as long as the PR remains as a draft it wont be able to be merged. Once we're ready, then I'll mark as ready. |
|
Thanks for contributing to Qiskit documentation! Before your PR can be merged, it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient. Thanks! 🙌 One or more of the following people are relevant to this code: |
| @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ | |||
| "\n", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Spin chain representation of a specific problem. The spin chain should be represented as a
SparsePauliOpobject.
Can this be updated for brevity?
Reply via ReviewNB
|
@mjrodriguez looks good, just one small edit. |
Co-authored-by: abbycross <[email protected]>
|
Does this need an approving review from @rowenwu? If not I can merge. |
SparsePauliOp